Integrating Gender Analysis in Coastal Communities into Environmental Health Risk Assessment: Household Hygiene Behaviour

Authors

  • Wahyu Handayani Universitas Brawijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30736/jev.v10i1.954

Keywords:

Environmental Health Risk Assessment, Gender, coastal sanitations, household hygiene, exposure pathways

Abstract

Environmental Health Risk Assessment (EHRA) is widely used to evaluate environmental exposure and related health risks, yet most applications assume households as homogeneous units and rarely consider gender-differentiated exposure pathways. In coastal communities—characterized by saline intrusion, inadequate sanitation, flooding, and climate-related stressors—household hygiene practices are strongly shaped by gendered divisions of labor. This literature review synthesizes recent peer-reviewed studies to examine how gender roles influence exposure patterns within household hygiene practices in coastal settings. A thematic analysis was conducted to identify differential exposure pathways, risk distribution, and structural determinants affecting women and men. The review reveals that women, as primary managers of water, sanitation, and caregiving tasks, face higher frequency and duration of exposure to microbiological and chemical hazards, while men’s exposure is more commonly linked to infrastructure-related or occupational activities. Conventional EHRA frameworks rarely disaggregate exposure by gender, potentially underestimating intra-household risk variability. Integrating gender analysis into EHRA improves the accuracy of risk characterization and supports more equitable environmental health interventions in vulnerable coastal communities.

Keywords: Environmental Health Risk Assessment; Gender; Coastal Sanitation; Household Hygiene; Exposure Pathways.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. L. Dupai, W. Widayati, L. Sara, and N. Yuniar, “Study on Community Health Behavior Coastal Society in Kendari City , Province of Southeast Sulawesi , Indonesia,” nternational J. Sci. Basic Appl. Res., vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 274–282, 2017, (Online). Available: http://gssrr.org/index.php?journal=JournalOfBasicAndApplied

2. Susilawati, R. H. Harahap, M. B. Mulya, and L. S. Andayani, “Heliyon Behavior model of community-based sanitation management in coastal areas : con fi rmatory factor analysis,” Heliyon, vol. 8, no. September, p. e11756, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11756.

3. Sunawati, Prihayati, and M. Ikhlasiah, “The Relationship of Environmental Sanitation and Hygiene Behavior with Stunting Incidents in Adults in 2024,” Nurs. Heal. Sci. J., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 465–471, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.53713/nhsj.v4i4.408.

4. M. Langstieh and S. Sahu, “Patriarchal Constraints in Everyday Lives : Gender Roles , Matrilineality , and the Status of Contemporary Khasi Women,” J. Int. Women ’ s Stud., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2026, (Online). Available: https://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol28/iss1/14

5. J. E. Igbe, “Journal of International Women ’ s Studies Rural Banditry in North Central Nigeria : The Experience of Women in Affected Communities”.

6. M. Naji, A. Mehrabi, E. Aghababaeec, and T. Orchard, “‘ I Painted It This Way Because I Belong Nowhere ’: Using Body Mapping to Explore Gender , Subjectivity , and Resilience among Afghan Immigrant Women in Iran,” J. Int. Women ’ s Stud., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 1–25, 2026.

7. W. H. O. (WHO), Guidelines on sanitation and health. Switzerland: Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO., 2018. (Online). Available: http://apps.who.int/iris.%0ASales,

8. B. A. Caruso et al., “Water , sanitation , and women ’ s empowerment : A systematic review and qualitative metasynthesis,” PLOS Water, vol. 1, no. 6 (e0000026), pp. 1–48, 2022, doi: 10.1371/journal.pwat.0000026.

9. M. C. Freeman et al., “PLOS GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH The impact of a demand-side sanitation and hygiene promotion intervention on sustained behavior change and health in Amhara , Ethiopia : A cluster-randomized trial,” PLOS Glob Public Heal., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–25, 2022, doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000056.

10. H. Snyder, “Literature review as a research methodology : An overview and guidelines,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 104, no. July, pp. 333–339, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039.

11. R. B. Petersen, N. Santesso, and G. H. Guyatt, “Systematic reviews of the literature : an introduction to current methods,” Am. Jpurnal Epidemiol., vol. 194, pp. 536–542, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae232.

12. K. J. Mattos, L. Eichelberger, J. Warren, A. Dotson, M. Hawley, and K. G. Linden, “Household Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Practices Impact Pathogen Exposure in Remote, Rural, Unpiped Communities,” Environ. Eng. Sci., vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 355–367, 2021, doi: 10.1089/ees.2020.0283.

13. A. Mertens et al., “Articles Effects of water , sanitation , and hygiene interventions on detection of enteropathogens and host-specific faecal markers in the environment : a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis,” Lancet Planet. Heal., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. e197–e208, 2023, doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(23)00028-1.

14. S. De Wit et al., “Water , sanitation and hygiene ( WASH ): the evolution of a global health and development sector,” BMJ Glob Heal., vol. 9, no. e015367, pp. 1–17, 2024, doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015367.

15. O. Cumming et al., “The implications of three major new trials for the effect of water , sanitation and hygiene on childhood diarrhea and stunting : a consensus statement,” BMC Med., vol. 17, no. 173, pp. 1–9, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1410-x.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-25

How to Cite

Handayani, W. (2026). Integrating Gender Analysis in Coastal Communities into Environmental Health Risk Assessment: Household Hygiene Behaviour . Jurnal EnviScience (Environment Science), 10(1), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.30736/jev.v10i1.954

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.